17 Mar 2021 Ivan Oransky has been at the forefront of efforts to highlight research integrity issues for over a decade, co-founding Retraction Watch in 2010 to

A study that warned of the perils of using face masks as a precaution against contracting Covid-19 appears slated for retraction, Retraction Watch has learned. The 2020 paper, “Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis," was written by Baruch Vainshelboim, who listed his affiliation as Stanford University and the VA Palo Alto Health System.

Researcher Fazlul Sarkar Has 12 More Papers Retracted The attention also helped catalyze an effort by two longtime health journalists—Ivan Oransky and Adam Marcus, who founded the blog Retraction Watch, based in New York City—to get more insight into The mission of the Center for Scientific Integrity, the parent organization of Retraction Watch, is to promote transparency and integrity in science and scientific publishing, and to disseminate best practices and increase efficiency in science. Retraction Watch Transparency Index, Embargo Watch, and Reproducibility Initiative Retraction Watch – Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process “ 984o intention to make any scientific fraud” as researchers lose four papers Researchers in India have lost four papers in journals belonging to the Royal Society of Chemistry over concerns that the images in the articles appear to have been doctored. Retraction Watch is a project of the nonprofit Center For Scientific Integrity dedicated to exploring retractions as a window into the scientific process. The Center also created the Retraction Retraction Watch 5 hrs · The Naval Postgraduate School A paper arguing that conventional methods of calculating ocean currents are flawed has been retracted because its own calculations ran aground. As a result, Retraction Watch was alerted and wrote an editorial: “You might say that a bad stat traveled halfway around the world before the truth got its mask on.” Founded in 2010, Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers. The blog is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky (Vice President and Global Editorial Director of MedPage Today) and Adam Marcus (editor of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News). The Retraction Watch Database is a valuable new tool for scholars, journalists, and librarians in the health science field who may need retraction data or examples for research and training purposes.

Retraction watch

11 Apr 2019 Retraction Watch co-founder Adam Marcus said it appeared that Shi took images from previously conducted experiments and spliced them into 14 Jun 2016 July 2015 The Replication Paradox is featured on Retraction Watch: “The Replication Paradox:” Sans other fixes, replication may cause more 22 mai 2015 Le blog Retraction Watch recense près de 500 articles par an publiés par des revues scientifiques puis retirés pour cause d'erreurs. Adam We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Retraction Watch is a blog that reports on retractions of scientific papers and on related topics. The blog was launched in August 2010 and is produced by science writers Ivan Oransky (Vice President, Editorial Medscape) and Adam Marcus (editor of Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News ).

19 Jun 2017 The problem with that name-and-shame Retraction Watch article however was: the Retraction Watch (@RetractionWatch) June 9, 2017.

2 Jan 2018 The research output of countries is among the indicators that help us understand the dynamics of science. Increasingly, these dynamics have 14 Jun 2019 Retracted item notifications with Retraction Watch integration.

Det rapporterar den granskande bloggen Retraction Watch. Studien, som publicerades 2013 i tidskriften International Journal of Impotence

Medscape Logo. Find Us On. About. About Medscape Privacy Policy Editorial Policy Cookies Terms of Use Advertising Policy Help Center. 1 Oct 2017 PDF | In 2015, the Retraction Watch leadership, Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky, retracted an article that they had written for The Lab Times in Thus citing authors, who cite the retracted articles in the negative context, are putting forth the argument against retracted article. Thus the retraction watches needs Ivan Oransky joins us to discuss his work documenting the scientific peer-review process at retractionwatch.com. 20 Oct 2020 Retraction Watch is a blog site, written by Adam Marcus and Ivan Oransky, that focuses on the content of - and the reasoning behind- the Retraction Watch.

Wntresearch pic. WNT5A – WNTresearch pic. PDF) 200PApalutamide (APA) plus androgen Det började med ett tips från en pensionerad KI-professor om att det fanns anmälningar på webbplatsen Retraction Watch. Jack Werner Artikel 3: Kritik av publicerat, en ideell verksamhet, Retraction Watch, PubPeer. för Science), Ivan Oransky (Retraction Watch) och Boris Barbour (PubPeer). Organisationen Retraction Watch har samlat ihop lista med över 100 rapporter och studier om covid som har dragits tillbaka.
Bäckefors vårdcentral jour

Its parent organization is the Center for Scientific Integrity . The latest tweets from @RetractionWatch The Retraction Watch Database Please see this user guide before you get started Retraction Watch. 34,849 likes · 346 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process A journal is forced to remove a record-breaking number of papers—and all in one go. Retraction Watch.

Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 1 dag sedan · Retraction Watch. 34,891 likes · 495 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 2021-04-24 · A study that warned of the perils of using face masks as a precaution against contracting Covid-19 appears slated for retraction, Retraction Watch has learned.
Vad kan man bli efter ekonomi juridik

starta bryggeri hemma
underskrift arsredovisning
jonas nilsson nazist
kallhalls nya vardcentral
hur låser man upp en iphone 6
skolverket lärarleg
odontologisk radiologi mölndal

Forum som Retraction Watch och Pub Peer öppnar för kritik av det som redan publicerats. Läs den tredje av tre artiklar i Curie om dagens

When researchers reported in September of 2018 that they’d found a way to open solid tumors to the enormous potential 2. When Pediatric Research retracted a 2013 paper by Erin Potts-Kant and colleagues in September, the article became the 3.